The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday concerns the right to vote. The Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution states the following: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” The Nineteenth Amendment adds, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”
These two amendments tell us that
the right for American citizens to vote cannot be denied on account of race,
color, previous condition of servitude, or sex. Both amendments include the
words “the right of citizens of the United States to vote.” This statement does
not seem to both liberal states and cities, such as New York City that has
recently passed a law allowing foreign citizens to vote in city elections.
Foreigners now have the right to vote on the mayor, City Council members,
borough presidents, and district attorneys as well as to vote on local ballet
measures.
\ Deroy Murdoch is based in Manhattan
and recently filed suit in New York Supreme Court with the goal to overturn
City Charter Chapter 46-A. His litigation has named the law “the Foreign
Citizen Voting Bill.” The law is slated to take effect on January 9, 2023.
Murdoch wrote the following:
Foreign citizens could invade the
U.S.-Mexico “border,” penetrate America without permission, request asylum, fly
to Westchester Airport aboard one of Joe Biden’s free, clandestine late-night
flights; take a cab to Manhattan, and – after 30 days – cast ballots alongside Gotham’s
voters who were born in the USA.
New York joins San Francisco, two Vermont
cities, and 11 Maryland communities in converting foreign citizens into local
voters. Most Americans consider this a sucker punch to the core principle of
government deriving its just powers from the consent of the citizens it
governs.
Voting by foreign citizens also could
fluster overwhelmed election officials. They would have to let foreign citizens
vote on local candidates and causes, but bar them from state and federal races.
During a frantic Election Day, what would
prevent precinct workers from unwittingly – or even deliberately – handing foreign
citizens ballots for local candidates and state-level, congressional, and even
presidential aspirants?
Some people may wonder why Democrats
are allowing foreigners to vote in elections. It makes sense when one realizes
the reason for the open borders: Black voters are leaving the Democrat Party
along with Hispanic voters. The party is searching for new voters, and they are
willing to collaborate with foreigners if Americans cast them aside. Murdoch
continued his article:
But the New York City law is not just
stupid, offensive, and dangerous. It has the added disadvantage of being
unconstitutional.
As our lawsuit details, it violates the 15
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1870: “The right of citizens of
the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States
or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”
My co-plaintiffs and I contend, and the
New York City Council’s deliberations confirm, that the new measure dilutes and
therefore abridges the votes of New Yorkers, not least Black citizens, because
local lawmakers acted “on account of race,” not color-neutral citizenship
grounds….
It also grinds its cleats into the New
York state Constitution. The latter limits the vote to “every citizen” who is
at least age 18 and a 30-day resident.
All Americans should be grateful the
Murdock and his co-defendants are fighting the law in New York City. Hopefully,
the idea of giving the vote to noncitizens dies in New York City.
No comments:
Post a Comment