The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday is the importance of securing elections in the United States. Today the “House Administrative Committee held the first in a series of hearings leading up to reintroduction of the American Confidence in Elections Act,” also known as the ACE Act.
According
to Fred Lucas at The Daily Signal, the bill was introduced in the Democrat-led
House, and preparations are being made to reintroduce it to the current
Republican-led House. Lucas wrote four takeaways from the hearing.
1. ‘Most Insidious Election Interference
in U.S. History’
West Virginia Secretary of State Mac
Warner, who supervises elections in his state, called out the now infamous
letter orchestrated by Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign – and in particular by
then-campaign aide Antony Blinken, now U.S. secretary of state.
Blinken reportedly was instrumental in
getting 51 former U.S. intelligence officials to sign a letter claiming that
the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop had “all the classic earmarks”
of Russian disinformation.
The letter from former intelligence
officials was used as justification to suppress the Biden laptop story in
social media and legacy media.
A Media Research Center poll shortly after
the 2020 election found that 36% of self-described Biden voters said they were
unaware of evidence that Joe Biden was personally involved in his son Hunter’s
business deals with China, a claim bolstered by emails found on the laptop. Of
those Biden voters, 13% -- or 4.6% of all Biden voters in the sample – said they
would not have voted for him if they had known about the laptop contents. The
Media Research Center, a conservative watchdog, said the shift could have
turned the election in Donald Trump’s favor….
2. Noncitizen Voting a ‘Recipe for Foreign
Interference.’
House Republicans’ ACE Act would prohibit
local jurisdictions from allowing noncitizen voting. Under the bill, Congress
also would exercise its responsibility over the District of Columbia to require
voter ID and annual maintenance of the city’s voter registration list, prohibit
same-day registration, and prevent the process of ballot harvesting….
3. ‘Common Sense to Require an ID to Vote.’
During the hearing, [Hans] von Spakovsky
pushed back on the myth that requiring voter ID suppresses voting. He noted a
report two years ago by the National Bureau of Economic Research that found
voter ID requirements had no negative impact on turnout based on 10 years of
data comparing states with voter ID laws and states with no such laws.
“The conclusion was that voter ID has
absolutely no effect on individuals; it doesn’t matter what race they are, it
doesn’t matter what gender, it doesn’t matter what socio-economic group,” von
Spakovsky said. “We know the public supports this. The polling is actually quite
something. Americans disagree quite sharply on many issues. The one thing they
agree on is that it’s common sense to require an ID to vote.”
Von Spakovsky went on to talk about
Georgia, which was maligned by the Left for passing legislation in 2021 to
extend existing voter ID requirements to mail-in voting. “Georgia had turnout
six percentage points above the national turnout and it had better turnout than
Delaware, the home state of the president, who harshly criticized the bill,”
von Spakovsky told lawmakers….
4. ‘Muddy Voter Rolls That Can Be Exploited.’
In the state of Michigan, Secretary of
State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, is fighting a lawsuit to keep the names of
about 26,000 dead people on the voter rolls.
The Public Interest Legal Foundation is suing
Michigan to force removal of those names in compliance with the 1993 National
Voter Registration Act.
“Some states are compliant with Section 8
of the National Voter Registration Act and conduct routine list maintenance.
However, others refuse to do that,” Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., said. “In your
opinion, why would a state intentionally refuse to perform list maintenance?
Such intentions aren’t good, said Ken Cuccinelli,
national chairman of the Election Transparency Initiative and former deputy
secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security….
No comments:
Post a Comment