The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday concerns parental rights regarding the gender identity of their children. California parents, along with parents nationwide, are fighting to keep communication open with their children. In reality, they are fighting to draw a legal line between the overreach of school districts and other government organizations and sanctity of the family, as defined by one of the parents.
There
are 944 school districts in California, but only five of them have affirmed the
rights of parents to know if their child is identifying of a different sex. The
latest school district to win the battle was the Rocklin Unified School
District not far from the capital of California. The other four school
districts are Chino Valley, Murrieta Valley Unified School District (Riverside
County), Temecula Valley Unified School District (Riverside County, and Anderson
Union High School District (Shasta County). A vote on a similar policy is
scheduled in the Orange Unified School District for Thursday evening.
The
policy in the Rocklin Unified School District requires “teachers to notify parents
if their children begin to identify as a member of another sex.” According to
the regulation, “schools must contact parents within three school days if their
child requests to use a name, pronouns, or sex-segregated facilities ‘that do
not align with the child’s biological sex.’” In addition, the gender identity
of a student will stay confidential to all people “except the student and their
parent(s).” The trustees for the Rocklin school indicated that they trust the
parents to know best what their children need.
“We trust our parents to know what is best
for their children. We believe that the best way to address these challenges is
together, with open communication and clear expectations. The board’s action to
strengthen parental notification and communication reinforces our commitment to
include parents in school activities and decisions related to their child.”
The
trustees stated that the goal for the new regulation is “strengthening the
relationship between our staff, students, and family.” “Hundreds of people”
attended the “six- and-a-half-hour meeting” with “more than four hours of
public comments.” Not all of the attendees had concern for children and
families at heart.
One
LGBTQ activist proclaimed, “This policy is violent…. You are waging war, and we
will not take it quietly…. We’ll shame you in public! … Take our kids’ futures
and we’ll take your livelihood!” When RUSD Board President Julie Hupp replied
that threats would not work with the board members, the activist said, “It’s
not a threat. It’s a promise!”
Some
teachers were dispensing rainbow ribbons to show that they oppose the new
regulation. Parents pleaded with those teachers to support parental rights with
one saying, “Please support parental rights. Basic safeguarding of children
means not keeping secrets from parents.”
Opponents
of the regulation made it clear that the fight is not over.
More
than a dozen years ago, Sister Julie B. Beck, then-Relief Society
General President for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, discussed
the key points of the doctrine of the family as taught in “The Family: A Proclamation to the World.” She also discussed the increasing threats to the
family unit.
In addition to understanding the theology
of the family, we all need to understand the threats to the family. If we
don’t, we can’t prepare for the battle. Evidence is all around us that the
family is becoming less important. Marriage rates are declining, the age of
marriage is rising, and divorce rates are rising. Out-of-wedlock births are
growing. Abortion is rising and becoming increasingly legal. We see lower birth
rates. We see unequal relationships between men and women, and we see cultures
that still practice abuse within family relationships. Many times a career
gains importance over the family.
Many of our youth are losing confidence in
the institution of families. They’re placing more and more value on education
and less and less importance on forming an eternal family. Many don’t see
forming families as a faith-based work. For them, it’s a selection process much
like shopping. Many also distrust their own moral strength and the moral
strength of their peers. Because temptations are so fierce, many are not sure
they can be successful in keeping covenants.
Many youth also have insufficient and
underdeveloped social skills, which are an impediment to forming eternal
families. They are increasingly adept at talking to someone 50 miles (80 km)
away and less able to carry on conversations with people in the same room. That
makes it difficult for them to socialize with each other.
We also face the problem that we read
about in Ephesians 6:12: “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but
against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of
this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” Public policies
are being made every day that are antifamily, and the definition of family is
changing legally around the world. Pornography is rampant. For those who
create pornography, their new target audience is young women. Parents are being
portrayed as inept and out of touch. Antifamily media messages are everywhere.
Youth are being desensitized about the need to form eternal families. (Emphasis
added.)
We see how this can happen when we read
the words of Korihor, an anti-Christ: “Thus he did preach unto them, leading
away the hearts of many, causing them to lift up their heads in their
wickedness, yea, leading away many women, and also men, to commit whoredoms” (Alma
30:18). Satan knows that he will never have a body; he will never have a
family. So he targets young women, who will create the bodies for the future
generations.
Korihor was an anti-Christ. Anti-Christ
is antifamily. Any doctrine or principle our youth hear from the world that is
antifamily is also anti-Christ. It’s that clear. If our youth cease to
believe in the righteous traditions of their fathers as did the people
described in Mosiah 26, if our youth don’t understand their part in the
plan, they could be led away. (Emphasis added.)
Any
individual, organization, policy, or program that seeks to destroy the family
is anti-Christ. Anti-Christ means evil. The people who put
themselves between parents and their children are evil and do not have the
wellbeing of the child in their minds and hearts.
No comments:
Post a Comment