The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday concerns statism, socialism, and communism. The election of Zohran Mamdani, a devout socialist, to be the next mayor of New York City – the financial capital of the United States and to the world – brought socialism to the forefront.
Victor Davis Hanson, senior contributor for The Daily Signal, claims in his article
on the topic that Mamdani admitted that he is a communist when he advocated for
“seizing the means of production.” “And almost every day, a quote from his past
comes out that suggests that he’s not just a socialist who wants the government
to control utilities or housing, but he wants to ‘seize the means of
production.’ That means the industrial base and private property itself.”
Hanson
continues his article by explaining why the above information is scary.
…
Because we have a whole generation who have gone through K-12 and higher
education and heard about the glories of statism, socialism, communism in the
universities and our school system, but not the merits of capitalism. It’s not
really socialism versus capitalism. It is socialism has nothing to offer. And
we know that for two reasons.
If
we look at the contemporary world, in the recent past and in the present,
everywhere a socialist paradigm has been implemented, it has done two things:
It has destroyed the economy and made people poor, and two, it has deprived
people of their civil liberties.
I
should add, it also has created greater inequality, at least in terms of the
ruling elite, who feel they’re not subject to the ramifications of their
socialist ideology, and they live a very refined and affluent lifestyle.
Hanson
suggests that we look at the Soviet Union before it collapsed, the collapsed
Mao’s China, Cuba under the Castro brothers since 1959. A more recent example
is Venezuela – once “the wealthiest country in Latin America” but now
collapsed. Other nations are collapsing to a lesser degree – Peru, Colombia.
Hanson
says that any nation that adopts socialism does not do well. China is doing
better now “because it has an odd mixture of a communist authoritarian
government, but it allows free market principles to save the economy from
itself.” He says that that “the same thing is true of President Vladimir Putin’s
Russia” which “achieved levels of gross domestic product, oil production that
were superior to the communist past, just simply because it had elements of a
market economy. Some market economy is better than none.” Hanson’s article
continues:
Why,
then secondly, does socialism fail? It is contrary to human nature. All of us
want to be rewarded for our own efforts. We’re unique individuals. We don’t
wanna be like a tessera in just one large mosaic….
And
that’s what socialism does. It tries to say that we’re all brothers and we all
love each other, and we all want the same thing. That’s what Mamdani is saying.
But
look at Mamdani himself. He comes from one of the more affluent families in New
York. His father is an endowed professor. He’s very well compensated. Hardcore
Marxist. Pro-Hamas. His mother is a multimillion-dollar filmmaker. He grew up
in affluence. He lives in a rent-controlled apartment, even though, by any
standard, he would be qualified as a wealthy person and doesn’t need a state
subsidy and could do better to give that apartment to someone with less means.
So,
my point is that socialism destroys private initiative. If you think the harder
you work, the better ideas you have, the more efficiency you can create in your
business or in your own life but you’re not going to be compensated more than
someone who does not either show those traits or doesn’t want to show those
traits….
We
have one last, more controversial proof that it doesn’t work. Since the Obama
age, the rate of socialist practices, policies, agendas in the United States
have vastly accelerated. And after the Obama presidency, the rather esoteric
political term “red state,” “blue state” became commonplace. And it basically
denotes those states who are more socialist and those states that are more free
market.
California
is a socialist state, in the sense that we’re talking, like New York, a 13%+
income tax rate at the highest rates. We have the highest gas and oil prices …
highest energy prices … highest housing prices. The same is true of New York …
Minnesota, Michigan, all of these states.
Why?
Because the central government, first of all, … goes after the opposition. And
most of these states are one-party state, without a viable opposition to keep
it in check. No. 2, the people who have created this socialist system are not
subject to it themselves.
[Think
Nancy Pelosis, Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Jerry Brown, Gavin Newsom – all]
very, very wealthy. They live lives completely distinct, separate from the
masses, whom they said would benefit from their socialist policy. And the
result is they took a paradise, like California, and turned it into purgatory.
So, there’s no empirical evidence whether, within the United States or abroad,
that there’s a socialist cure for what socialism has done.
Mamdani
has, basically, taken a New York under Bill de Blasio and prior mayors that was
a socialist paradigm and is in dire straits, and he thinks more socialism will
cure it….
So,
what we’re seeing in Europe today is disastrous policies, importing poor illegal
aliens with antithetical political, religious, cultural, social views than the
Europeans themselves….
Are
people happy? No. As we speak, there are right-wing … conservative, free market
governments in places like Hungary, the Czech Republic, Italy and growing in
places like Britain, the Netherlands, Austria, in France itself. The
opposition, who opposes socialism, is gaining and the people are behind it.
Why? Is it because they don’t know socialism? No. It’s because they know it all
too well.
No comments:
Post a Comment