It is no secret that Americans are fiercely divided between liberals and conservatives with a few million people known as independents hanging out in the middle. The division is both wide and deep, and it is growing wider and deeper.
Neil Howe is a demographer, historian, and author, and he has remarkable success in predicting the future. According to Tyler O’Neil at The Daily Signal, Howe “says a civil war in the U.S. is far more plausible than most people think, and he dismisses the reasons Americans often discount that possibility.”
In 1997, he published a book with Bill
Strauss, “The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy – What the Cycles of History
Tell Us About America’s Next Rendezvous with Destiny.” In that book, he
suggested five catalysts for a major crisis – and four of the five have already
come to pass.
“One of our events was a crisis over the
debt, which would issue forth in a new tea party movement,” Howe tells “The
Daily Signal Podcast.” He calls it “just completely random that we happened to
use that phrase,” which the tea party movement adopted in 2010.
“The other one was a WMD [weapon of mass
destruction] attack on New York City,” Howe says, noting the eerie parallel
with Sept. 11, 2001. “The other one was the [COVID-19] pandemic, and the fourth
one was Russia invading a former Soviet republic,” such as Ukraine.
The final potential catalyst? “A nullification
crisis, where one or more of the states would actually nullify federal
regulation, which would lead to a new secession movement,” Howe says.
Howe
has a generational theory that “America should expect a major crisis about
every 80-100 years, and we’re due for another ‘rendezvous with destiny’ such as
the Great Depression and World War II.” Howe calls these happenings “fourth
turnings.” “They force society to create a new order in the civic ‘outer world’
about 40 or 50 years after ‘awakenings’ drive people inward, seeking order in
their spiritual ‘inner worlds.’”
Howe notes that “our politics have taken
on this kind of Manichaean style, where the red zone and blue zone are so
mutually exclusive in their sense of themselves, their agenda for the nation’s
future, that it hardly even matters who’s leading the party.”
(“Manichaean” refers to the tendency to view
one side as perfectly good and the other side as perfectly evil, and it traces
back to a world religion that arose with the prophet Mani in the 200s A.D.,
which taught that the physical world is evil and the spiritual world is good.)
He cites Carl Becker, who authored an
essay in 1941, “The Dilemma of Modern Democracy.” When most of what you’re
talking about is the width of sidewalks and the diameter of sewer pipes, just
coordination issues, democracy works really well,” Howe says. “But when you’re
talking about issues that virtually define who you are, it doesn’t work. He
said no one is going to accede to a vote count that goes 51% against you.”
“You are not going to give up everything
you believe in just because you came up three votes short,” he explains.
This
is not the first time that there has been a great division in America. Howe
claimed that similar divisions took place “in the 1770s, the 1850s, and the
1930s.” However, the current polarization does not have neat lines of division
like that of the U.S. Civil War. When The Daily Signal noted this fact,
Howe replied that “blue cities in red states actually makes conflict more
likely.”
“There are two ways in which we enter this
fourth turning very differently from earlier fourth turnings, which are
worrying,” Howe says.
First, he notes, “government is so huge
going into this fourth turning,” while most fourth turnings require government
to ramp up in order to face existential threats.
Second, he notes “the size and global
power of our military” make the U.S. a central player in world affairs, so a
U.S. Civil War will have massive ramifications across the globe.
“If it requires our forces around the
world to stand down for six months, the entire world will remake itself,” he
says. “The entire world, for better or for worse, depends upon our presence to
be what it is.”
Howe also notes that during a civil war,
one side often asks for external help: “This is a rule through all civil wars.”
The
discussion then considered when such a civil war would start. In fact, there
was no civil war during previous “’mini starter crises’ of 9/11, the tea party
movement, COVID-19, and the Ukraine war did not ‘catch fire’ and ignite the
massive existential crisis that defines a fourth turning.” The author’s answer
was, “The survival of the country has to be at stake.”
“With regard to World War II, I think FDR
made the case – it was very persuasive for the country – we did not want to be
the only democracy left on earth,” he explains.
“This is the way incentives work,” Howe
says. “You’ve got to feel everything’s on the line to push you to do something.”
Things have to come to a head in order to
force people to come together and create a new order in society. How exactly
that will happen is yet to be determined.
With
all the evils in the world – human trafficking, child sexual slavery, gangs,
drugs, and the new axis of evil (Russia-China-Iran) to name a few, I wonder if
the new order in society will be brought about by the Second Coming of Jesus
Christ. The signs of the times are becoming more frequent and obvious.
One
of the most obvious signs is the way that people – including a sizable portion
of residents of the United States – and nations are blaming Israel for not
doing more to solve the problem with Hamas. They do not seem to understand that
Hamas could stop the war with Israel today or tomorrow, but they do not want to
stop it. They want to destroy the nation of Israel and destroy all Jews. That
is their goal, and they make it obvious.
God
will never allow the Jews to be destroyed as a nation. The Jews are God’s
chosen people, and He will protect them with His power.
No comments:
Post a Comment