Individuals are stronger when they are literate or able to read and write, and strong individuals can unite in creating strong families, communities, states, and nations.
In an
article published at The Deseret News, the Center for the School of the Future (CSF) shared ideas that affect reading abilities in students. The Utah
Legislature established the CSF at Utah State University “to collaborate with
public education stakeholders to improve student academic outcomes.”
Utah
Gov. Spencer Cox is serious about improving the reading performance of students
in Utah. One of the ways to do so is to understand how essential it is to
protect truth. Part of protecting truth is to identify “persistent myths about
early reading and replacing them with what research shows.
Research
shows that less than 50% of third graders in Utah can read on grade level (proficient).
Other states could have similar or lower percentages of students who can read
at grade level. This should be of critical concern for Americans because
students have difficulty catching up later and reading skills are essential for
academic success as well as success in life.
CSF
shared the following information to show the importance of reading at grade
level by the third grade.
Research
provides a clear answer: Third grade reading proficiency is one of the
strongest predictors of long-term academic, economic and life success. It marks
the transition from “learning to read” to “reading to learn.” When students are
not reading proficiently by the end of third grade:
·
Catching
up becomes significantly more difficult.
·
Academic
struggles increase in middle and high school.
·
Disengagement
and disruptive behavior become more likely.
·
Dropout
risk increases by roughly four times.
·
Long-term
educational and career prospects decline sharply.
These
are well-established facts. Yet several myths continue to obscure them.
Here
we address five such myths currently occurring in public discussion about early
reading. Others will undoubtedly emerge and must also be confronted over time.
Myth 1: Learning to read is natural.
Fact: Learning to read is not natural.
The
human brain is not biologically wired to read in the way it is wired to walk or
talk. The brain is wired to learn spoken language (talking and listening)
without formal instruction. Reading is fundamentally different. Neuroscience
shows that:
·
Humans
were never wired to read.
·
A
reading brain is neurologically different from a nonreading brain.
·
Reading
requires the brain to reorganize and repurpose existing neural structures.
·
If
reading were biologically wired, dyslexia and students who struggle to learn to
read would not exist.
·
While
a few children learn to read “naturally” without any instructions, most do not.
·
With
high-quality instructions, 90-95% of children can learn to read.
Myth 2: Children learn to read simply by being read to
or by reading on their own.
Fact: Most children must be taught to read through
formal instruction.
Reading
aloud to children is valuable – it builds vocabulary and shows that print
carries meaning. However, it does not teach children how to decode written
language. Only a very small percentage of children – less than 5% -- learn to
read independently without instruction. The vast majority require explicit,
structured and systematic teaching to become skilled readers.
Myth 3: Because Utah students perform relatively well
on the fourth grade National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), students
are doing well enough.
Fact: “Well enough” is not good enough.
Utah
fourth graders outperform those in most other states on NAEP reading, but this
is not cause for celebration. In 2024, only 36% of Utah fourth graders scored
at the proficient or advanced level on NAEP. That means nearly two-thirds did
not meet proficiency. If research shows that 90-95% of students can learn to
read, then far better outcomes should be achievable. Indeed, some Utah school
systems have already demonstrated trajectories that approach this goal.
Myth 4: Third graders who are not proficient readers
are “illiterate.”
Fact: Illiteracy is a term for adults -- not children.
Labeling
children as “illiterate” is inaccurate and counterproductive. Illiteracy refers
to adults who cannot read or write. Children are learners. We do not label
students who struggle with fractions as “mathematically illiterate” or those
learning budgeting as “financially illiterate.” The accurate term is “nonproficient
readers,” children who can read but are not yet meeting expectations.
Moreover,
the word, “literacy” itself has become so broadly applied – financial literacy,
health literacy, gardening literacy – that it has lost precision….
Myth 5: You don’t need strong reading skills to
succeed today.
Fact: Proficient reading matters more than ever in the
21st century.
Whether
students attend college, pursue technical training or enter the workforce
directly, strong reading skills are essential. They matter because:
·
Reading
underpins all later learning.
·
Most
jobs require interpreting complex texts and digital information.
·
Strong
reading is linked to higher graduation rates, better health outcomes, lower
incarceration rates and greater economic stability.
·
Civic
life depends on citizens’ ability to read and understand complex documents –
legal, medical, financial and governmental.
Early
reading success matters profoundly. So does high-quality reading instruction
and early identification of struggling readers. These arguments are not an
indictment of teachers – nothing matters more to teachers than their students’
success….
No comments:
Post a Comment