The Senate voted 68-32 on Thursday,
June 27, 2013, to overhaul the immigration system for the United States. The Senate plan claims the requirement of
making tough changes to secure the borders of our nation while at the same time
creating a path to citizenship for millions of people who have come to our
nation illegally. Why would any sensible
person want to reward people who have broken our laws?
The thousand-page bill was
crafted by the “Gang of Eight” – four Senators from each party – and was later
amended in order to get enough votes to pass.
Thirty-two Republicans voted against the bill while fourteen
Republicans, two Independents, and fifty-two Democrats voted for it. I am sad to report that both of my Senators –
Democrat Mark Begich and Republican Lisa Murkowski – voted for the bill.
This is the first serious
attempt to overhaul immigration law since amnesty was granted to millions of
illegal aliens in 1986. It did not work
then, and it will not work this time.
The reason that it did not work and will not work is because our elected
officials refuse to secure our borders.
We must secure our borders in order to know who is in our country and
why they are here.
Speaker of the House John
Boehner (R-Ohio) claims, “The House is not going to take up and vote on
whatever the Senate passes. We’re going to do our own bill.” Many Republicans in the House believe that
any bill passed by the House will be “compromised” once it is passed and are
therefore urging no bill to be passed in the House.
The Senate bill is a means to
grant “backdoor amnesty” to millions of illegal aliens; this part of the bill
is simply a plan to generate more loyal followers from the Hispanic
community. By passing this bill, the
Senate failed to exercise its constitutional responsibility to block “backdoor
amnesty” as well as to support strict enforcement of the federal immigration
laws that already exist. This all
advances the plan of the Obama Administration that ignores the Constitution,
bypasses Congress and the American people and enacts changes in the regulations
that benefit those who come into our nation illegally.
Congressman Lamar Smith
(R-Texas), former chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said, “… the Obama
administration is cooking the books to make it look like they are enforcing
immigration laws, when in reality they are enacting amnesty….” He added, “… President Obama and his
administration continue to circumvent Congress and use executive branch
authority to allow illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S.” and have “made
clear that it plans not to use but abuse these powers … the Obama
administration cannot continue to pick and choose which laws it will
enforce. It is outrageous that they have
put illegal immigrants and their liberal political base ahead of the American
people.”
Judicial Watch, Inc. is a
non-partisan, non-profit organization with headquarters in Washington,
D.C. It was established in 1994 to serve
as a “watchdog” over “our government, legal and judicial systems and to promote
a return to ethics and morality in our nation’s public life.” Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch,
said, “Since 1994, Judicial Watch has used the courts to hold public officials
accountable for their actions. And since 2005, we have blazed an historic trail
in challenging state and local `sanctuary’ policies that coddle illegal aliens
and undermine our immigration laws, as well as exposing and challenging the
Obama administration’s efforts to abuse Executive Authority by granting
`stealth’ amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.”
Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa
County, Arizona, said, “Among the worst problems facing us in the fight against
illegal immigration are `sanctuary’ policies that tie the hands of local law
enforcement people. At one time we had
that problem right here in Phoenix where police officers were prohibited from
asking about a person’s immigration status or cooperating with federal
immigration agents…. Thanks to the U.S.
Supreme Court, we now have far greater freedom in protecting our citizens from
criminal illegal aliens.” He added that
“taking on sanctuary cities, towns, counties, and states across America” is
“the most important fight in the illegal immigration war.” He thanked Judicial Watch for fighting that
battle.
Although Judicial Watch has won
many battles in this war, they are still fighting numerous new ones and request
assistance from Americans. They want to
stop the plan for “backdoor amnesty” as well as the Obama Administration’s
attempt to “gut” Arizona’s tough illegal immigration enforcement laws. They also need our help to fight “the Obama
administration’s compulsive secrecy (we have initiated nearly 1,000
open-records requests, many related to the Obama administration’s efforts to
undercut our laws against illegal immigration and enact amnesty for illegal
aliens through the back door.).”
President Obama received massive
support from Hispanic voters in the last election; he and his minions are now
“politically driven” to “lock in that part of the electorate for years to come and
appease the most radical `open borders’ groups with more payoffs.” Judicial Watch claims that the Obama
Administration are 1) “refusing to prosecute illegal alien sanctuary cities and
counties that violate federal law by not cooperating with federal immigration
authorities,” 2) “advancing BACKDOOR AMNESTY through `administrative measures’
that bypass Congress and that may very well be unconstitutional,” 3) “attacking
and attempting to block tough new state immigration enforcement laws in Alabama
and Arizona, and threatening other pro-enforcement states with the same
treatment if they also attempt to protect their citizens from the scourge of
illegal immigration,’ and 4) “using so-called `prosecutorial discretion’ to
dismiss outright potentially hundreds of thousands of legal cases against
illegal aliens and permit them to stay in the United States in violation of the
law! It’s obvious now that law
enforcement and public safety have taken a back seat to their efforts to satisfy
illegal immigration advocacy groups and lock in this important voting bloc.”
No comments:
Post a Comment