The liberty
principle for this Freedom Friday concerns freedom of inquiry and expression. The
First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States declares: “Congress shall make no law … abridging the
freedom of speech or of the press….” Amendment 1 was adopted on December 15,
1791, as the first of ten amendments constituting the Bill of Rights.
Yet, freedom of speech has been
curtailed and even prevented on liberal university campuses across the United
States because someone might feel uncomfortable by something someone else says.
Spineless and/or liberal administrators at colleges have allowed liberal and
progressive students to force rules curtailing the freedom of speech on their
campuses and demanding “safe places” where they will not feel threatened by
words.
Finally, a university stands up
to the pressure. Jay Ellison, Dean of Students at the University of Chicago,
sent a letter to the class of 2020 informing them that one of the university’s “defining
characteristics is our commitment to freedom of inquiry and expression.” The
letter warned incoming students to not expect “trigger warnings” or “safe
spaces” on campus.
In its first paragraph the
letter congratulates incoming freshmen on being accepted to the university and
welcomes them to the campus. The second and following paragraphs informed
students of the university’s stand on free speech.
“Once here you will discover
that one of the University of Chicago’s defining characteristics is our
commitment to freedom of inquiry and expression…. Members of our community are
encouraged to speak, write, listen, challenge, and learn without fear of
censorship. Civility and mutual respect are vital to all of us, and freedom of
expression does not mean the freedom to harass or threaten others. You will
find that we expect members of our community to be engaged in rigorous debate,
discussion, and even disagreement. At times this may challenge you and even
cause discomfort.
“Our commitment to academic
freedom means that we do not support so-called `trigger warnings,’ we do not
cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we
do not condone the creation of intellectual `safe spaces’ where individuals can
retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”
You can find the entire letter at this site, and I hope you will read it. I find the letter to be very refreshing. I am
grateful for those universities and other schools that refuse to curtail
academic freedom because of pressure from liberals.
Students go to universities,
colleges, and other schools to learn. How can they learn if they are censored
in what they can speak, write, or hear? I enjoy hearing the viewpoints of other
people because I know they come from different backgrounds and different
experiences and can add to my knowledge. The more knowledge I gain, the better
I am equipped to make informed decisions. The opposite is also true. If
knowledge is withheld from me, I am less able to make good decisions.
Could this be the reason freedom
of speech is curtailed on liberal campuses? Conservative principles work every
time they are tried, and they bring more freedom with their policies. Liberal
leaders must be afraid they will lose followers if their followers are allowed
to hear conservative ideas! I applaud
the University of Chicago in their commitment to academic freedom!
No comments:
Post a Comment